Skip to content


The official publication of the North American Conference on British Studies (NACBS), the Journal of British Studies, has positioned itself as the critical resource for scholars of British culture from the Middle Ages through the present. Drawing on both established and emerging approaches, JBS presents scholarly articles and books reviews from renowned international authors who share their ideas on British society, politics, law, economics, and the arts. In 2005 (Vol. 44), the journal merged with the NACBS publication Albion, creating one journal for NACBS membership.


The NACBS awards a prize of $500 annually for the best piece of original research produced by a student in a “stand-alone” M.A. program at a university or college in the U.S. or Canada.

Essays may be from any department—History, English, Cultural Studies, Gender Studies, etc.—but must relate to a topic in British Studies. Essays nominated for this prize may deal with subjects related to the British Isles or with some aspect of the British Imperial/Post-Colonial experience, broadly construed. Entries must not exceed fifty pages in length, inclusive of notes and/or illustrations.

The following conditions apply:

  • Nominees must be students (or recent graduates) of a “stand-alone” M.A. program. “Stand alone” refers here to an M.A. degree earned at an institution that offers a master’s degree that is separate from a Ph.D. program and not simply a degree earned, as a matter of course, along the way to ABD status. This means that potential nominees might come from either a program with just an M.A. or programs where the M.A. and Ph.D. are awarded as separate degrees and candidates are admitted through separate application processes.

  • Nominees may be currently enrolled in an M.A. program, recent graduates of an M.A. program (within one year of degree completion), or Ph.D. students (again within one year of having completed a degree in a terminal, “stand-alone” M.A. program).

  • Submitted papers should be no more than 50 pages in length (inclusive of notes and/or illustrations). A longer (more than 50-page) M.A. thesis may be edited down to fit the word limit. Alternatively, stand-along chapters from a longer thesis will also be considered.

  • The prize will be decided by a committee of three faculty members from institutions with “stand-alone” M.A. programs. Whenever possible, there will be broad disciplinary representation on this committee.

Procedures for Nomination:

Nominating faculty must be current members of the NACBS. Submissions must be accompanied by a nominating letter from the professor, who should have taught the course for which the essay was written or supervised M.A. thesis work. Submissions should include the permanent mailing address and email contact information for the student nominated.

An electronic copy of the essay and the letter of nomination (sent as two separate documents—either WORD or PDF) should be sent to EACH of the following three members of the prize committee by 11:59 p.m. on December 15, 2022, via e-mail. The essay file should be named (NOMINEE’S NAME_Essay). The letter of nomination file should be named (NOMINEE’S NAME_Letter). Contact details, including e-mail addresses, for each committee member appear below:

Chair: Jeff Schauer
Department of History
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
[email protected]

Arunima Datta
Department of History
Idaho State University
[email protected]

Jacob Steere-Williams
Department of History
College of Charleston
[email protected]


Ariel Morrison Credeur (Florida Gulf Coast University), “Women’s Economic Lives and Gendered Public Spaces in Early Modern English Texts.”

Ariel Morrison Credeur’s thoughtful essay explores questions about women and work in early modern England that have been the subject of lively debate among scholars of the field. After a crisp discussion that situates the project within recent historiographies concerning labor and of the rise of the public, she analyzes representations of English women’s work in books and printed ephemera using five key documents. Credeur identifies in these sixteenth- and seventeenth-century texts evidence of a public discourse on gendered divisions of labor, agency, and space and points to a shift in the later seventeenth century that both reflected and informed women's entrance into broader political and social exchange.